Categories
Uncategorized

Research on masks and covid deaths

Science of Mask Risks

https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/science-of-mask-risks_3610261.html
In their last installment, researchers concluded that due to the extensive risk to mask wearers documented in these papers, “we urgently recommend that no adult or child be coerced to wear a mask under any circumstances.” (https://pdmj.org)

“Those blue masks available at the grocery store, they’re sterilized with ethylene oxide, which is a known carcinogen. And they are made with PFOA in their fibers which is a known lung cancer risk,” Huber said. “I retweeted this on Twitter and I was kicked off for seven days.”

Another issue with mask-wearing is particulates. “If you inhale particulates, then you put yourself at risk for lung diseases,” Huber said. “One of the worst diseases that we mention that is a risk is pulmonary fibrosis. It’s a very threatening disease because there is no cure for it in conventional or natural medicine. Pulmonary fibrosis is slow suffocation of a patient. The survival rate at five years is only 20 percent.”

Before this report went to print, Huber was removed from Twitter permanently.

Mask Mandates Seem to Make CCP Virus Infection Rates Climb, Study Says

https://m.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/face-mask-mandates-seem-to-make-ccp-virus-infection-rates-climb-says-study_3629627.html

In states with a mandate in effect, there were 9,605,256 confirmed COVID-19 cases, which works out to an average of 27 cases per 100,000 people per day. When states didn’t have a statewide order—including states that never had mandates, coupled with the period of time masking states didn’t have the mandate in place—there were 5,781,716 cases, averaging 17 cases per 100,000 people per day.

In other words, protective-mask mandates have a poor track record so far in fighting the coronavirus. States with mandates in place produced an average of 10 more reported infections per 100,000 people per day than states without mandates.

Johns Hopkins University Newspaper Pulls Down Article Questioning COVID-19 Death Tolls

https://link.theepochtimes.com/mkt_app/johns-hopkins-university-newspaper-pulls-down-article-questioning-covid-19-death-tolls_3595884.html

“Surprisingly, the deaths of older people stayed the same before and after COVID-19,” the JHN article read. “Since COVID-19 mainly affects the elderly, experts expected an increase in the percentage of deaths in older age groups. However, this increase is not seen from the CDC data. In fact, the percentages of deaths among all age groups remain relatively the same.”

When it comes to causes of deaths, Briand found that the total decrease in deaths by other causes almost exactly equals the increase in deaths by COVID-19. She said this is likely because that many deaths have been incorrectly labeled as COVID-19 deaths when they would have been attributed to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza, and pneumonia.

The JHN article was pulled down on Thursday without explanation. The student newspaper on Friday wrote on Twitter that the article was “being used to support false and dangerous inaccuracies” about the impact of the pandemic, and that they “regret that this article may have contributed to the spread of misinformation about COVID-19.”

These data analyses suggest that in contrast to most people’s assumptions, the number of deaths by COVID-19 is not alarming. In fact, it has relatively no effect on deaths in the United States.

As Briand compared the number of deaths per cause during that period in 2020 to 2018, she noticed that instead of the expected drastic increase across all causes, there was a significant decrease in deaths due to heart disease. Even more surprising, as seen in the graph below, this sudden decline in deaths is observed for all other causes.

This suggests, according to Briand, that the COVID-19 death toll is misleading. Briand believes that deaths due to heart diseases, respiratory diseases, influenza and pneumonia may instead be recategorized as being due to COVID-19.

83ddb0f4 0b8a 4259 8bc0 8da2d0b2eab5.sized 1000x1000 1

It’s Not a ‘Reset,’ It’s a Counterrevolution

https://m.theepochtimes.com/its-not-a-reset-its-a-counterrevolution_3616414.html

It’s not by accident that public figures who know their movements and actions are closely watched by the press and public have been repeatedly caught on camera violating their own regulations. They want to be seen flaunting the random rules they’ve shoved down the throats of their constituency.

They don’t care if you call them hypocrites, because they want you to know that they’re above both the law and, most importantly, you. And you’re powerless to do anything about it. You don’t own your labor; you don’t own your property or your lease when they’re keen to show you they can take it all from you at any time they like.

COVID-19 is the most successful information operation in history. That’s not to say it’s a “hoax”—it’s extremely contagious, targets various systems in the body, makes people very ill, and is especially deadly to the elderly and infirm. And the seriousness of the CCP virus is what makes it all the more monstrous that America’s political, corporate, and cultural elite have used it as a platform to advance their privileges and preferences without any checks or balances to stand in their way.

Investor and political theorist Adam Townsend asked, “Are we watching the fastest roll-up of power in human history?” It’s not a “reset” but a counter-revolution, targeting the moral and religious foundations of the country and the revolution that gave birth to it—all men, created in the image of God, are created equal. It’s not we who have drawn the battle lines.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *